**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Wed Apr 03 02:59:58 2013 Apr 03 04:03:44 I was trying to make modifications in the existing package of core Apr 03 04:04:00 I had replaced the its tar file withing sources Apr 03 04:04:22 and then rerun bitbake Apr 03 04:04:26 but it was not built Apr 03 04:04:41 so do I have to build it seprately Apr 03 07:15:04 good morning Apr 03 07:35:23 Hi everybody Apr 03 07:39:24 otavio: I can't see the gpu-updates patchwork bundle http://patches.openembedded.org/bundle/otavio/gpu-updates-20130401/ nor I see the patches merged. What happend to the patchwork bundle? Apr 03 07:45:26 Uh, it looks like patches are in, it's just github mirror is not already in sync. Apr 03 08:00:50 morning all Apr 03 08:01:01 morning Apr 03 08:09:11 hi bluelightning, erbo, all Apr 03 08:27:44 bluelightning: Btw, regarding my problems with DISTRO_FEATURES yesterday. It turned out I had made the assignment in the wrong file (i.e., in the image recipe). It worked much better when I set it in local.conf... Apr 03 08:41:20 Saur: aha... mystery solved :) Apr 03 08:41:40 Saur: thanks, at least it wasn't an undiscovered bug Apr 03 10:24:52 rburton: about xinput-calibrator... Apr 03 10:24:59 mckoan: hey Apr 03 10:25:32 rburton: ;-) Apr 03 10:25:36 rburton: dependency chain was: ['xinput-calibrator', 'xterm', 'libxaw', 'xmlto-native'] Apr 03 10:25:58 rburton: I would add them to meta-oe/recipes-graphics Apr 03 10:26:01 why does xi need xterm? Apr 03 10:27:00 http://git.openembedded.org/meta-openembedded/commit/?id=bab6476691ba2a2d944ec814008f79e04a6a114a Apr 03 10:27:25 oe-core has two other terminals already Apr 03 10:27:45 rburton, JaMa: fine thx I am changing the recipe Apr 03 10:27:47 and isn't there an alternatives thing for that? Apr 03 10:28:44 rburton: hmmm I have to investigate that Apr 03 10:29:15 maybe not Apr 03 10:29:38 rburton: there isn't VIRTUAL-RUNTIME_x-terminal for that Apr 03 10:29:56 u-a can help on target but not with metadata Apr 03 10:30:14 rburton: BTW after calibration the pinter goes crazy, probably there is a problem with xorg touch driver Apr 03 10:30:23 i was hoping that there was an alternatives for terminals, like debian. sadly not. Apr 03 10:30:23 s/pinter/pointer Apr 03 12:18:04 panda84kde: yes; they're merged Apr 03 12:18:20 damnit pam Apr 03 12:19:03 otavio: yes, I've noticed. Thanks for the confirmation however Apr 03 12:19:32 panda84kde: you're welcome Apr 03 12:19:55 panda84kde: I am cooking two more patches to gpu as well Apr 03 12:21:08 otavio: which aspects do they touch? Apr 03 12:25:35 panda84kde: packaging Apr 03 12:25:55 panda84kde: and I hope for the last time Apr 03 12:25:58 lol Apr 03 12:26:13 otavio: is something broken / not working now? Apr 03 12:28:13 panda84kde: yes Apr 03 12:28:17 panda84kde: gst-gl Apr 03 12:29:10 panda84kde: and I fixed qt4 support I think Apr 03 15:37:08 hmm. is there some nice way for cleaning unused/old work directories short of removing everything and starting from scratch? Apr 03 15:37:25 tmp/work takes up around 100GB here, I think I should clean that one up a bit :) Apr 03 15:38:40 Sput, INHERIT += "rm_work" Apr 03 15:38:46 Sput: there is also scripts/cleanup-workdir ; I've not used it myself Apr 03 15:38:59 Sput: cleaning up is over-rated :) Apr 03 15:39:01 rm_work is probably a better option Apr 03 15:39:01 walters: yeah, but I would like to keep around the latest copy at least for certain packages Apr 03 15:39:15 bluelightning: aaah, just found that. I already had found sstate-cache-management, that's quite useful Apr 03 15:39:30 rburton: unless you are on an SSD :) Apr 03 15:39:38 Sput: that is true :) Apr 03 15:39:58 Sput: RM_WORK_EXCLUDE in master; or for older versions: http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2013-March/037579.html Apr 03 15:40:29 thx; I'll look into that Apr 03 15:40:45 first I'll try out cleanup-workdir and see what it does Apr 03 15:41:01 "Deleleting" :D Apr 03 15:42:29 looks like cleanup-workdir does exactly what I asked for, removing outdated workdirs while keeping current ones... I'll have a look at the other solution in case that makes more sense for me Apr 03 15:45:52 thanks for your help :) Apr 03 16:36:19 hi. does sb. know where /dev gets mounted on yocto 1.3 with udevd 164? i don't use an initramfs and it has no entry in fstab. /etc/init.d/udev does not do it as well, as /dev is already mounted when this is called. is there some in-kernel~ or /sbin/init magic? the mount shows up in dmesg at least... Apr 03 18:09:31 FTR: CONFIG_DEVTMPFS_MOUNT=y it is Apr 03 18:20:41 I feel we ought to document that somewhere but I'm not sure where we would... Apr 03 18:26:34 khem. good news. I'm up and crashing qemumips + systemd. experimenting more. Apr 03 18:26:40 qemumips64 to follow. Apr 03 19:59:58 Hello. Apr 03 20:00:19 I just did a "git pull" in my meta-intel checkout, and I'm now getting very strange build failures. Apr 03 20:00:49 I updated my recipe to point to emgd-1.16, and now when the kernel is built, it first merges in emgd-1.14, then emgd-1.16. Apr 03 20:01:20 The second merge fails due to the first merge, and I wind up with merge conflict markers in the code that the kernel is trying to build. Apr 03 22:31:51 Can I run devshell before do_patch on a kernel recipe? Apr 03 22:32:33 not easily, but you can set PATCHRESOLVE = "user" which should make it automatically spawn a devshell if the patches fail to apply Apr 03 22:34:06 I have patches failing to apply, yet not being picked up by bitbake, resulting in an attempt to build the kernel with merge markers in the source. Apr 03 22:34:18 ah, interesting Apr 03 22:34:19 One patch is being applied that shouldn't be, and I'm trying to track down where it's coming from. Apr 03 22:34:32 So, I want to run do_patch manually. Apr 03 22:34:33 well, you could always hack it temporarily by modifying devshell.bbclass's addtask Apr 03 22:45:49 Any way to make it write run.do_patch but not actually run it? Apr 03 22:46:18 the run script gets saved to a file all the time. you can always run it yourself from outsdie of bitbake.. Apr 03 22:47:01 I'm in the devshell after do_validate_branches but before do_patch. I would like to see what do_patch would do without actually doing it. Apr 03 22:48:05 do a bitbake -c patch at least once, re-enter the devshell, and run the run. sript Apr 03 22:48:12 * kergoth shrugs Apr 04 00:59:22 I'm trying to update an ancient recipe, and I'm getting the following error: Apr 04 00:59:53 ERROR: ParseError at .../pyside/libshiboken_1.1.2.bb:28: unparsed line: 'STAGING_LIBDIR_NATIVE = ${STAGING_DIR}/${BUILD_SYS}${prefix}/lib' Apr 04 01:00:06 What was STAGING_DIR, and what would it be nowdays? Apr 04 01:12:08 Circuitsoft: that recipe shouldn't be defining that variable at all. Apr 04 01:12:24 So, does that variable already exist? Apr 04 01:13:29 bitbake -e is your friend Apr 04 01:19:50 What would cause CMAKE_AR-NOTFOUND ? Apr 04 02:10:28 How do I adjust a bitbake recipe to separate the build folder from the source folder? **** ENDING LOGGING AT Thu Apr 04 02:59:58 2013