**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Thu Mar 06 17:53:55 2014 **** ENDING LOGGING AT Thu Mar 06 18:00:42 2014 **** BEGIN LOGGING AT Thu Mar 06 18:02:19 2014 **** ENDING LOGGING AT Thu Mar 06 18:06:04 2014 **** BEGIN LOGGING AT Thu Mar 06 18:08:20 2014 Mar 06 18:49:30 hi there - anyone around using Qt with QtQuickControls on eglfs by any chance? Mar 06 18:50:37 seezer: I used to. Mar 06 18:50:55 I used to use opengl* Mar 06 18:51:11 are you sure qtquickcontrols are supported on it? Mar 06 18:53:22 lpapp: nah i'm not - but didn't read the contrary either Mar 06 18:54:09 mr_science: ok, I managed to crosscompile something.. but i did by adding custom libraries to the arm toolchain in an... not so elegant way :/ Mar 06 18:54:14 comboboxes act really weird for me - haven't really tried to debug it or anything, just trying to get some information on it first. Mar 06 18:54:48 mr_science: by extracting the *.so files from precompiled arm.deb packages Mar 06 18:54:51 like are the combobox popups a violation of the 'only one top level window' paradigm Mar 06 18:55:19 lpapp: would you're guess be that the controls aren't supported? Mar 06 18:55:26 *your Mar 06 18:56:03 seezer: I would only use it for desktop. Mar 06 18:56:34 or mayhaps android, but nothing less minimal. Mar 06 18:58:08 thing is the UI could be validly called "combobox driven" :/ Mar 06 19:02:16 lpapp: why wouldn't you use it? because of the featureful/"heavy" implementation? Mar 06 19:04:49 Hi ! Mar 06 19:06:49 Where is the kernel config file used by bitbake when it build an image (ex : angstrom console-image) ? Mar 06 19:07:51 RP: last world build shows increased number of failures (I guess some are from aclocal changes), it would be great to wait with B != S a bit now for this batch to settle Mar 06 19:12:13 seezer: it is very heavy Mar 06 19:12:20 seezer: and it is not well tested on real embedded. Mar 06 19:12:46 you're talking qtquickcontrols specifically right? Mar 06 19:13:38 drfu_: if you can remember to ping me (nerdboy) at home i can take a look Mar 06 19:14:16 then i can shove a fix at Crofton or something... Mar 06 21:04:03 halstead: ping. any idea why we lost ab10? Mar 06 21:16:36 JaMa: ok, noted, thanks Mar 06 21:16:48 JaMa: I'll hold off it for now Mar 06 21:19:14 I'll send updated status in +- 2 days Mar 06 22:40:27 So, I'm looking to integrate a package, and it uses something I'd not previously encountered called "distutils" which is apparently a Python thing. Mar 06 22:40:37 So you're supposed to write, e.g., "python setup.py build" or "python setup.py install". Mar 06 22:41:06 And it imports the distutils module, which has "from email import message_from_file", but the Python install that Yocto is using for host tools doesn't have the email module. Mar 06 22:41:27 So far as I can tell, this is being used solely as a convenient parser for "Header-Name: Value" entries in config files, not actually sending email. Mar 06 22:41:53 I saw one message on the Yocto list from someone else who hit this, but no responses, and I am just curious as to whether there's any existing packages using this. Mar 06 22:45:48 i swear i've built distutils or setuptools based python modules with yocto before, but i dunno. never seen that one personally Mar 06 22:46:24 The simplest solution from my point of view would be to figure out how the existing Python install got generated, and change things so it gets generated with the email module so it will Just Work. Mar 06 22:46:41 indeed, sounds like the best bet Mar 06 22:46:43 And yeah, if there's anything using distutils already, it may be there's some obvious way to outsmart it. I just couldn't immediately see one. Mar 06 23:04:32 seebs: i think i used distutils-base instead Mar 06 23:05:05 iirc that one doesn't require a setup.py Mar 06 23:06:14 btw is Hob an acronym, and what does it stand for? Mar 06 23:07:22 I'm looking at an existing package which has a setup.py. I guess I could try to replace it. Mar 06 23:07:40 pidge, Not. sure about ab10. It seems hard frozen. No panic message. No failures in the hardware logs. It did have to limit performance to protect itself. I'm power cycling. Mar 06 23:17:27 seebs: try setuptools maybe? Mar 06 23:18:37 In an ideal world, I'd find a solution which did not require me to rework the package, but just let me use its existing configure/install mechanism. :) Mar 06 23:19:10 seebs: no, i meant inherit setuptools instead of distutils Mar 06 23:19:31 Oh! I'm not inheriting anything, I didn't know there were inheritable things for those. Mar 06 23:19:42 I was just doing do_compile() { python setup.py build } Mar 06 23:19:43 doh! Mar 06 23:20:10 much better if you inherit one or the other Mar 06 23:21:37 one or the other should work, i swear... Mar 06 23:23:24 That seems likely, I'll investigate. **** ENDING LOGGING AT Fri Mar 07 02:59:58 2014