**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Sat Mar 22 02:59:59 2014 Mar 22 08:38:48 Hi, can somebody pls help me? I'm trying to build core-image-x11 with weston (CORE_IMAGE_EXTRA_INSTALL += "wayland weston" & DISTRO_FEATURES_append = " wayland" in local.conf) for wandboard quad but weston fails with dora and master branch (both giving the error: No package 'wayland-egl' found) Mar 22 10:44:01 hai all , am cross compiling libnfc-1.7.1 for libfreefare , am getting these http://pastebin.com/fWdkj2Pi error messages. **** BEGIN LOGGING AT Sat Mar 22 14:01:45 2014 Mar 22 14:04:09 is there any may to get more log output? a verbose doesnt print much more :( Mar 22 15:16:51 regorianer: I just read the individual task log files Mar 22 16:37:56 bluelightning: which one do you mean? i have a log folder with an output file, but that file is equal to my console output. and the individual files the console output gives me, dont help much more. it's a bit difficult to find a problem, if the error just says something like "error ... returned 32", and if you search a bit, you find out that a package is missing, but u cannot find, why exactly this package is missing (in my case it is a Mar 22 16:37:57 locale-base-tr-tr, but all the other locales, like locale-base-de-de, locale-base-nl-nl are just fine. Mar 22 16:54:07 regorianer: see tmp/work////temp/log.* Mar 22 20:58:12 Hi folks - if anyone's around I have a question about building the nativesdk. First a bit of background: I've got a package 'foo' that is a library that compiles to a set of header files and static archives (.a files), with no runtime dependencies - bitbake produces three package variants: 'foo-dev_...ipk', 'foo-staticdev...ipk', and 'foo-dbg...ipk', but no runtime package 'foo...ipk' I assume this is correct. I have a Mar 22 20:58:12 second package 'bar' that depends on 'foo' to build. Everything seems to work perfectly when I issue 'bitbake image' - everything builds correctly and I'm able to run 'bar' under qemu. Mar 22 20:59:03 The problem comes when I try to built 'bitbake image -c populate_sdk': the final step appears to fail because it is unable to find 'foo....ipk', required by 'bar-dev...ipk' Mar 22 21:00:05 Is there something that I need to specify in the recipe for 'bar' such that it only depends on 'foo-dev' and foo-staticdev'? Mar 22 21:14:31 wotte: is the chain only via bar-dev -> foo-dev -> foo ? Mar 22 21:16:58 bluelightning: As far as I can tell, the chain is only bar-dev -> foo Mar 22 21:17:49 I have found an "unsatisfied recommendation" for foo-dev in the log, which is a little strange Mar 22 21:38:14 What's more is the bar-dev package is completely empty. I'm not sure why it is being created or required Mar 22 21:40:06 -dev packages always get created so the dependency chains work Mar 22 21:40:30 we set ALLOW_EMPTY_${PN}-dev = "1" to make that happen Mar 22 21:41:15 I'm not quite sure what's going on in your case; is there any RDEPENDS_${PN}-dev = "foo" in the recipe perhaps? Mar 22 21:48:45 Ahh, gotcha. No RDEPENDS, only DEPENDS = "foo other stuff". I'll try suppressing the -dev package and see if that gets me anywhere, or blows up spectacularly. Mar 22 21:53:51 Actually, would ALLOW_EMPTY_${PN} = "1" in foo allow me to make an empty runtime package, and sidestep this problem entirely? Mar 22 22:03:40 wotte: that would also do it yes Mar 22 22:05:06 Yup. Appears to. Thanks bluelighting for all your help. Appreciate it. **** ENDING LOGGING AT Sun Mar 23 02:59:58 2014