**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Thu Jun 19 02:59:59 2014 Jun 19 06:56:03 good morning Jun 19 07:31:37 Hi all...... while compiling my own recipe i added package called "fuse" it's getting error as mentioned in link http://pastebin.com/ZcTF8FUR . what is th problem i cant understand Jun 19 07:41:21 elinuxer: "Files/directories were installed but not shipped" means that you've installed files in ${D}, which means you expected them to be in a binary package eventually. however you didn't include these files in any binary package Jun 19 07:42:16 in your specific case, the file isn't a regular file, but /dev/fuse... so without knowing too much about the recipe, i think you should not create device nodes in do_install Jun 19 09:07:45 I want to prepare filessystem for ramboot in yocto, For that i want ext2.gz.u-boot extension in file system, i have checked IMAGE_FSTYPES variable values, but it is not available there. How can i do that? Jun 19 09:14:58 Hi, I'd like to include zImage in my rootfs, I already set RDEPENDS_kernel-base = "kernel-image" but it didn't work as expected. Are there any other options i should set? Jun 19 09:19:40 andreasw: is it for simpad? Jun 19 09:20:03 yes Jun 19 09:20:37 ok, then try to copy from other conf files in meta-handheld Jun 19 09:20:49 i.e. see zaurus.inc: Jun 19 09:20:49 MACHINE_ESSENTIAL_EXTRA_RDEPENDS_append = " kernel-base kernel-image" Jun 19 09:21:04 ok, i will have a look at those... Jun 19 09:21:05 well' standardize all machines one day... Jun 19 09:22:59 andreasw: let me know if there are issues with NOR flash Jun 19 09:54:27 morning all Jun 19 10:04:18 hi bluelightning Jun 19 10:31:04 ant_work: Thank you, works perfectly... Jun 19 11:03:12 andreasw: nice. Which kernel are you building? Jun 19 11:22:28 ant_work: I haven't decided yet, I'd like to use fairly recent version, if it won't work i will probably go back to 2.6.27 Jun 19 11:22:43 ant_work: Can you recommend some version? Jun 19 11:25:15 I'm asking because there isn't any linux_xyz.bb recipe anymore Jun 19 11:25:45 I'd try linux-yocto_3.14 as first Jun 19 14:08:54 hi quick patch question. Jun 19 14:09:28 Does bitbake ignore the folder name in the patch? Jun 19 14:09:37 or mangle version numbers or something? Jun 19 14:10:40 I'm looking at the patches for mariadb5 in meta-oe, mariadb Jun 19 14:10:43 http://cgit.openembedded.org/meta-openembedded/tree/meta-oe/recipes-support/mysql/mariadb Jun 19 14:11:39 http://cgit.openembedded.org/meta-openembedded/tree/meta-oe/recipes-support/mysql/mariadb/configure-ps-cache-check.patch and http://cgit.openembedded.org/meta-openembedded/tree/meta-oe/recipes-support/mysql/mariadb/configure.in.patch hav different paths, yet the recipe still builds. Jun 19 14:12:26 i canot find any explination in the docs, or ist something obvious about patch that i should know but i don't? Jun 19 14:13:37 gotan: patches are effectively applied with -p1 by default Jun 19 14:13:55 so the first part of the path in the patch is ignored Jun 19 14:14:33 ok thats the obvoius i missed. Jun 19 14:14:54 that can also be adjusted by specifying a striplevel= parameter in the SRC_URI entry for the patch Jun 19 14:18:14 btw, bitbake does not support --no-verify-repo in the repo:// fecther, and so fails. Jun 19 14:18:31 speaking of SRC_URI Jun 19 15:20:15 does world compile every version of a package, or just the preferred version? Jun 19 15:31:40 blloyd: just preferred. and in the case where there are multiple providers of something, only the preferred one of those, too Jun 19 15:39:46 thanks for confirming what I thought. Jun 19 16:02:23 * kergoth notices own-mirrors.bbclass doesn't include gitsm:// and rolls eyes Jun 19 16:32:33 RP: looks like own-mirrors.bbclass and the meta-yocto poky.conf PREMIRRORS don't include gitsm://, fyi Jun 19 16:37:47 kergoth: ah, right. We should fix that... Jun 19 16:39:03 kergoth: fixed meta-yocto at least, the benefit of being that layers maintainer :) Jun 19 16:39:07 :) Jun 19 16:41:21 Hi there ! I have some issues with creating my own bsp layer and the website says they have a friendly community ;-) I created the layer by using the yocto-bsp script. It is called base (meta-base directory). I adapted the bblayers.conf and local.conf files. But when I enter bitbake core-image-full-cmdline I get a bunch of errors: Jun 19 16:41:41 ERROR: Task do_install_ptest_base from /home/hofmann/poky/meta/recipes-kernel/lttng/lttng-tools_2.4.0.bb seems to be empty?! Jun 19 16:41:42 ERROR: Task do_configure_ptest_base from /home/hofmann/poky/meta/recipes-devtools/valgrind/valgrind_3.9.0.bb seems to be empty?!############### | ETA: 00:00:12 Jun 19 16:41:42 ERROR: Task do_compile_ptest_base from /home/hofmann/poky/meta/recipes-devtools/valgrind/valgrind_3.9.0.bb seems to be empty?! Jun 19 16:41:42 ERROR: Task do_install_ptest_base from /home/hofmann/poky/meta/recipes-devtools/valgrind/valgrind_3.9.0.bb seems to be empty?! Jun 19 16:41:46 WARNING: Variable do_install contains tabs, please remove these (/home/hofmann/poky/meta/recipes-devtools/apt/apt-native_0.9.9.4.bb)############## | ETA: 00:00:11 Jun 19 16:41:49 NOTE: Error during finalise of /home/hofmann/poky/meta/recipes-devtools/apt/apt-native_0.9.9.4.bb Jun 19 16:41:51 ERROR: ExpansionError during parsing /home/hofmann/poky/meta/recipes-devtools/apt/apt-native_0.9.9.4.bb: Failure expanding variable do_install: SyntaxError: invalid syntax (, line 2) Jun 19 16:43:13 (the last few lines) Jun 19 16:44:01 found on linkedin Jun 19 16:44:06 Jefro, ^^ Jun 19 16:45:04 ntmtk: are you using "base" as a name anywhere else? such as DISTRO or MACHINE? Jun 19 16:45:52 Well for the machine Jun 19 16:46:49 I assumed I should use base for the machine name in local.conf Jun 19 16:47:04 ntmtk: right, in that case you may want to try a different name for that, since that becomes an override and then interacts badly with those task names Jun 19 16:47:08 But I don't use it anywhere else Jun 19 16:47:37 Sorry I am new to bitbake, oe-core an yocto Jun 19 16:47:50 ntmtk: no problem; this is a bit of a strange situation to understand Jun 19 16:48:11 overrides allow you to conditionally apply a value to a variable, based on the current configuration Jun 19 16:49:03 ok Jun 19 16:49:23 i.e. if I have FOO = "value1" and FOO_base = "value2", if MACHINE is set to "base", FOO will be set to "value2"; if it's set to something else it will be "value1" Jun 19 16:49:56 ahh ok Jun 19 16:50:26 extending that to this situation, if you have a function called do_install_ptest_base defined, and "base" applies as an override (which it will in your situation) then it will instead set a function called do_install_ptest rather than do_install_ptest_base Jun 19 16:50:36 we should have used a different separator or syntax or overrides, something which isn't perfectly valid in a variable name, but it's too late to do anything about it now :) Jun 19 16:50:41 s/or/for/ Jun 19 16:50:48 kergoth: yes, we should... RP has lamented the same thing Jun 19 16:50:54 *should have Jun 19 16:51:30 ntmtk: so basically I'd strongly suggest using a name other than "base" ;) Jun 19 16:51:56 ok, i will try that. thanks :-) Jun 19 16:52:04 I have to admit I am unsure as to why _base was used for those task names though, on the face of it it seems superfluous Jun 19 16:54:31 perf seems slow Jun 19 16:54:48 as in it is showing a function running in a program that exitted Jun 19 16:56:52 kergoth: I have wondered if we should attempt a migration. The question would be which character would be better? Jun 19 16:57:41 '^' perhaps Jun 19 16:58:38 * RP -> afk Jun 19 16:59:04 its a good question. alternatively, it could be its own syntax, associated with the operator rather than the variable. FOO =[arm] "bar" or FOO .=[arm] or something, but i'm not sure if thatd be any clearer or not. needs discussion Jun 19 16:59:35 i think there'd be potential for less confusion if the override was associated with the operator Jun 19 16:59:48 RP: didn't Esben use ! in oe-lite? Jun 19 16:59:55 kergoth: agreed, would need a lot of discussion Jun 19 17:00:17 yeah, oe-lite would be worth looking at, they broke away from us on that already Jun 19 17:00:17 bluelightning: I don't remember offhand Jun 19 17:00:24 is there a list somewhere of all the hardware that has the yocto BSP ? Jun 19 17:00:59 i'd love to somehow eliminate the FOO_append_arm vs FOO_arm_append confusion, though I'm not sure how offhand Jun 19 17:01:54 kergoth: isn't FOO_arm_append wrong almost all of the time? in which case should it generate some kind of warning? Jun 19 18:39:36 with the latest yocto build systems, I'm seeing /dev/root mounted at /. Used to, it would be /dev/sda1. It wouldn't be a big deal if the device /dev/root existed (symlink or otherwise), but on my system there is no /dev/root. Is this how it is supposed to work? Jun 19 18:41:16 it doesn't need to exist Jun 19 21:54:21 if it doesn't exist, how can it have needs? Jun 19 21:56:50 xerent_: 'it doesn't need to exist' doesn't imply 'it doesn't exist' ;-) so it might exist, while it would have had to exist ;-) Jun 19 21:57:21 it would not have had to exist. Jun 19 23:42:37 * nerdboy wondering where the X keys went Jun 19 23:43:04 first it was just cursor keys, now it's everything Jun 19 23:44:02 first i thought it was so my own mods, so i went straight upstream master, but no change Jun 19 23:44:53 anybody have a working sato image built from master poky/meta-openembedded? **** ENDING LOGGING AT Fri Jun 20 03:00:00 2014