**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Fri Oct 24 03:00:01 2014 Oct 24 07:33:15 but what does Ubuntu do differently than yocto with suspend-utils? Oct 24 08:49:22 xerent: which machine is it? Oct 24 09:17:41 morning all Oct 24 10:21:22 dl9pf: FYI, I managed to reproduce the issue we talked about yesterday, and it looks like someone else filed a bug about it in the mean time: https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6880 Oct 24 10:21:23 Bug 6880: normal, Undecided, ---, richard.purdie, NEW , Redhat/Fedora Shellshock Fix Leads To oe_terminal breakage Oct 24 10:34:46 hi guys Oct 24 10:34:59 anybody here? Oct 24 10:39:38 We use Yocto in our team with our own custom layer. Quality team pushes for introducing some kind of validation for this component. Is there any out of the box solution? Oct 24 10:58:37 Xz: hi Oct 24 10:58:53 Xz: what kind of validation are you looking for? Oct 24 11:23:53 mckoan: Boards are Kontron COMe-bIP6 i7-3517UE (where suspend doesn't work) and Congatec TS77 i7-3517UE (where suspend does work) Oct 24 12:00:01 xerent: so are there different kernels? Oct 24 14:59:21 bluelightning: ah - good to know. Yes, that is the issue. Oct 24 15:17:30 ohai. The documentation says python 3.x is not supported? Does this mean i can't use a py3.x project on the target platform? Oct 24 15:24:55 riot: no, what that means is you still need python 2.x on your build host in order to run the build system Oct 24 15:25:05 python 3 on the target is supported as of 1.6 (daisy) Oct 24 15:25:28 aah, okay. no problem, i almost can guess why.. is it paramiko somewhere in the stack? Oct 24 15:26:11 * riot would love to use fabric for final project deployment (which requires 2.7, too) - is that compatible/amicable with yocto's approach? Oct 24 15:28:45 no, we don't use paramiko; we did a load of python 3.x compatibility fixing but the last little bit still eludes us Oct 24 15:29:38 I'm not familiar with fabric, to be honest Oct 24 16:10:59 bluelightning: eludes you? is there a ticket/issue or something i can look at? Perhaps i can help :> Oct 24 16:12:42 riot: there is a bug open, it's a bit short on details as to what still doesn't work though: https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2398 Oct 24 16:12:43 Bug 2398: enhancement, Medium, Future, richard.purdie, IN PROGRESS IMPLEMENTATION , make bitbake work using python 3.x Oct 24 16:13:11 ok Oct 24 16:13:25 I need a drink. pidge posted an xray on G+ Oct 24 16:14:46 aah, 2.x backwards incompatibility, yes that can be a hard nut to crack, but i've been collecting hints, tips&tricks for that.. i think, i'll just try out yocto and see if it suits my needs. when it does, i'll see whether i get it to run with 3.x, then backporting that to 2.x+ could be feasible Oct 24 16:15:20 * riot is maintaining several libraries and i aim for 2.x+ (i.e. 3.x too) compatibility. Oct 24 16:15:58 good old bitbake.. when have i touched that beast last.. some time ago, for my openmoko, i think =) Oct 24 16:26:03 riot: that would be awesome Oct 24 16:29:24 bluelightning: if yocto turns out to be the answer in my search for a continuous deployment vm-builder-cannon, i'll gladly help out. the search has been going for far to long. Oct 24 16:29:42 things like vagrant, veewee and whatnot are just not hitting the nail i have Oct 24 16:29:58 I shouldn't have to do bitbake -c cleansstate IMAGE when an image includes a package that has a new version should I? Oct 24 16:30:27 blloyd: no Oct 24 16:32:19 ok, just one image of mine seeming to have problems with it. Will try to isolate what I am doing wrong or what bitbake doesn't handle well. Oct 24 19:28:52 so, if i miss a debian package in yocto, i'll just have to write up a recipe, yes? Oct 24 19:29:08 (I'm already missing python-pymongo and python-pygrib :) Oct 24 19:30:16 yep Oct 24 19:30:51 so, in essence, i get debian without a lot of stuff i don't need/want.. that is pretty much what i was looking for all the time. and it seems to work, too.. Oct 24 19:31:10 * riot tests the shit out of this now :D Oct 24 19:31:10 RP: are you going to push the CMake fix soon? It is being holding my to fix its use with Qt5. Oct 24 19:32:35 oh, one last big thing: yocto is probably not going to support systemd anytime soon, right? Oct 24 19:33:30 riot, already does Oct 24 19:33:50 uh, but, uh, is it built upon systemd? Oct 24 19:34:04 can only find one related recipe Oct 24 19:35:31 http://cgit.openembedded.org/cgit.cgi/openembedded-core/tree/meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd_216.bb?h=master Oct 24 20:20:23 Hi Oct 24 21:00:05 otavio: merged Oct 24 22:39:40 Does Florin Sarbu from Wind River hang out here? Oct 24 22:52:02 Hi , is there someone ? I need some help to compile tizen with yocto please :-) Oct 24 22:56:01 Samouy: what's your question? Oct 24 22:57:07 I need to compile Tizen with yocto . I'm on Debian with generic86-64 machine Oct 24 22:57:21 i followed procedure on manual build on tizen wiki Oct 24 22:57:27 Samouy: https://wiki.tizen.org/wiki/Build_Tizen_with_Yocto Oct 24 22:58:08 Yes :-) i followed the entire procedure , but bitbake fail Oct 24 22:59:32 This is the error message : http://pastebin.com/k3wcKs1n Oct 24 23:00:49 So i don't know if i should disable checker or not **** ENDING LOGGING AT Sat Oct 25 03:00:01 2014