**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Fri Mar 13 02:59:59 2015 Mar 13 04:12:37 hello world, nice to meet you Mar 13 05:33:26 Hello. I'm trying to deploy something using meta-erlang. I can't seem to find many resources on how I would use a layer like that to then compile more applications using the resulting package. Can anyone point me to some documentation that may help with something like this, or an example perhaps? Mar 13 07:02:49 Hi. Anyone with good knowledge about PR that can help me understand following use case. When not using PR-server (used release is 1.3 Danny) how does a bbclass update affect the recipes that are using it? Currently I have never increased PR/PRINC in those situations, but should I do that? Mar 13 08:22:03 <_4urele_> hi Mar 13 08:22:54 <_4urele_> is it possible to increase PR (and rebuild) a recipe each time we build an image? Mar 13 08:23:52 <_4urele_> I would like to have a file with the "build time" inside and also a package with it Mar 13 08:24:38 hmm what I do is patch local.conf every build I think Mar 13 08:26:42 <_4urele_> rink_ could you please tell me how? I don't see how it could generate a file on each build... Mar 13 08:26:54 <_4urele_> :q Mar 13 08:27:09 oh, we do that outside of Yocto Mar 13 08:27:41 when our build server fetches the tree, it runs some scripts (adeptly named versionchanger) who patch the version build in there Mar 13 08:27:42 <_4urele_> ok thanks! Mar 13 08:27:54 may not be what you need, but it works quite well Mar 13 08:29:01 <_4urele_> i wanted to have it without commiting anything... but it could be fine Mar 13 08:38:43 _4urele_: you can have a recipe that uses ${DATE} or ${DATETIME} and thus should rebuild for every build (forcing the image to rebuild if the packages produced by the recipe are in the image) Mar 13 08:38:49 morning all Mar 13 08:40:51 <_4urele_> bluelightning, beautifull thanks Mar 13 09:57:14 hi, how can i set my own layer to search before poky layer? i got wayland-1.5 in my layer and i want to build 1.5 and not 1.6 from poky layer Mar 13 10:00:22 ericbutters: maybe you could use PREFERRED_VERSION_wayland instead Mar 13 10:01:03 <_4urele_> ericbutters : did you tried with the layer priority? we manage that with it Mar 13 10:04:44 _4urele_: what is the exact VAR you set? BBFILE_PRIORITY_core = "5" is in poky layer.conf Mar 13 10:04:57 what should that be in my layer? <5? Mar 13 10:06:00 joseppc: joseppc: i set: PREFERRED_VERSION_wayland = "1.5" but got preferred version 1.5 of wayland not available (for item wayland) Mar 13 10:07:15 <_4urele_> BBFILE_PRIORITY_meta-aurele = "10" in my layer conf file Mar 13 10:07:18 ericbutters: "1.5%"? Mar 13 10:07:37 <_4urele_> but prefered version should be just fine for you ;) Mar 13 10:08:36 <_4urele_> I don't know if layer priority works to set a lower version :) ) Mar 13 10:10:10 a higher layer priority will cause lower recipe version numbers to be selected (in the absence of PREFERRED_VERSION) Mar 13 10:13:07 joseppc: "1.5%" works Mar 13 10:17:20 bluelightning: is it possible to print out all layer priorities? Mar 13 10:18:56 ericbutters: bitbake-layers show-layers Mar 13 10:22:11 joseppc: thanks Mar 13 10:29:21 bluelightning: _4urele_: setting a higher value for priority works also Mar 13 10:29:34 ericbutters: you're welcome :) Mar 13 11:40:34 Old Yocto projects (e.g. Dora) seem to have serious mismatches between Wayland/Weston and FreeRdp. Is anybody familiar with the topic? Mar 13 13:12:37 muppe, dora is now in the community support stage: https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Releases, someone might be able to help but Wayland has been moving along quickly. Can you try a newer release? Mar 13 13:22:16 Hello does anyone know if there is a way to configure EFI to autoboot grub instead of running bootx64 or other command on EFI shell ? Mar 13 13:39:05 I'm having a set-up where I have a bunch of projects in a folder and the recipes to them in another folder, referring in the recipe via SRC_URI="file:/..." Mar 13 13:39:16 now a lot of the projects have changed, but yocto seems not to detect all the changes Mar 13 13:39:28 did someone else already have an issue like that? Mar 13 14:34:55 Is there a tutorial or a good example for making a fragment-based kernel configuration? Mar 13 14:35:22 I'm writing an application layer that requires some special kernel features (and sets bounds to kernel versions). Mar 13 14:35:57 I would like to have a kernel configuration fragment which would work on all possible kernels above a certain version. Mar 13 14:52:50 I'm having an issue with a generated image where after booting I get an error: "/bin/sh: error while loading shared libraries: libtinfo.so.5: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory" Mar 13 14:53:08 I can verify libtinfo.so.5 exists. Mar 13 14:53:28 Has anyone encountered this issue? Mar 13 15:00:27 <_4urele_> FileNotFound, did you tried to find wich package install this? then try to add it to the image via "IMAGE_INSTALL" (in th image.bb file) or "CORE_IMAGE_EXTRA_INSTALL" (in your local.conf) Mar 13 15:05:40 Hello everyone, I do not succes to change the owner of a configuration file (/etc/default/ntpdate) despite my different test. I tried this : http://pastebin.com/tDN90qS9 (and I previously create my user and it works with /home/foo/my_file) Mar 13 16:43:25 quit Mar 13 16:43:38 exit Mar 13 17:35:06 bluelightning: heh, i installed an ext sdk for the first time and it hung at preparing build system, never returned. or at least, i started it yesterday afternoon, and it's still sitting there Mar 13 17:35:17 is there a cooker log for that bitbake run? Mar 13 17:36:05 kergoth: I'm ashamed to say it's sent to /dev/null atm, I know that's not good Mar 13 17:40:36 I think Randy might be going to look into that once he's done with the systemd log issue Mar 13 17:42:07 k Mar 13 18:47:34 bluelightning: fyi, when i tried to reproduce the preparing build system steps: ERROR: Timeout while attempting to communicate with bitbake server, ERROR: Could not connect to server False: Mar 13 18:47:43 and then the client/UI hangs Mar 13 18:47:53 hmm, that's pretty ugly :/ Mar 13 18:47:57 not sure what's going on there Mar 13 18:48:02 * kergoth restarts with a fresh build purely upstream build env to make sure its nothing mel related Mar 13 18:48:25 yeah, no idea, never seen anything like that before. no idea where that False is coming from, quite dd Mar 13 19:56:42 I'm having some difficulty with oe_runmake. In my makefile, I have 2 rules that look like this: Mar 13 19:56:52 $(CC) -DVIRTUALIZED -g $(INCLUDES) -o $@ -c $< Mar 13 19:57:08 the othre one is for CXX Mar 13 19:57:58 the CC one works fine, while the CXX one strips out -DVIRTUALIZED -g $(INCLUDES) Mar 13 20:30:08 hi guys, I'm trying to figure out what's the variable name that creates directory tmp/work/ Mar 13 20:30:26 I checked ${TARGET_SYS} but on my build it is different Mar 13 20:31:18 is it MULTIMACH_TARGET_SYS ?? Mar 13 20:34:16 actually TARGET_SYS is not even mentioned on YP.org/ref-manual Mar 13 20:34:25 PKG_CONFIG_SYSROOT_DIR Mar 13 20:34:46 export PKG_CONFIG_SYSROOT_DIR="/home/dan/Projects/fsl-community-bsp/build/tmp/sysroots/rom-7420" Mar 13 20:34:59 that's from a run.do_compile Mar 13 20:36:28 cyclist: is that answer to me? Mar 13 20:36:36 yes Mar 13 20:36:38 cyclist: I just joined the channel Mar 13 20:36:44 cyclist: I'm not interested in sysroot directory Mar 13 20:36:49 that's the sysroot one Mar 13 20:37:06 cyclist: but the directory that most of the stuff gets built in Mar 13 20:37:38 cyclist: e.g. i586-poky-linux Mar 13 20:37:39 change sysroots to work Mar 13 20:37:54 just the last part? Mar 13 20:37:58 cyclist: I'm just looking for variable that creates it, yes Mar 13 20:38:07 hold on Mar 13 20:39:18 cyclist: I did few greps on two different builds and it looks like MULTIMACH_HOST_SYS is the answer Mar 13 20:40:14 cyclist: ups, MULTIMACH_TARGET_SYS Mar 13 20:41:32 at what stage are you using it? Mar 13 20:41:49 in a do_compile() or something? Mar 13 20:43:25 cyclist: I have a custom recipe with a custom function - I need to base my 'if' on that Mar 13 20:43:46 cyclist: so that my recipe applies only to few boards Mar 13 20:44:57 but where is your "if"? do_*() scripts? Mar 13 20:45:47 if it is, wou can strip it out of $(S) Mar 13 20:45:52 using cut Mar 13 20:46:15 cyclist: well, I could - that's not very professional though :) Mar 13 20:46:27 cyclist: there are variables for that, so I'm happy to use them Mar 13 20:46:39 cyclist: without involving any extra super computations Mar 13 20:46:56 cyclist: {S} got created somehow by variables concat Mar 13 20:47:27 if you look at one of the generated run.do_whatever logs, it shows all of the variables Mar 13 20:47:48 they're not all exported to the shell, though Mar 13 20:48:21 and the do() functions are basically shell scripts Mar 13 20:48:30 cyclist: correct Mar 13 21:06:45 this would do it: Mar 13 21:07:58 x=($(echo ${S} | sed -e 's+/+ /'g)) Mar 13 21:08:16 p=$(expr ${#x[@]} - 4) Mar 13 21:08:52 arch=${x[$p]} Mar 13 21:09:06 then use ${arch} as your variable Mar 13 21:36:54 so we upgrade to openssl 1.0.2 which is great but who is fixing the fallouts ? Mar 13 21:37:03 arent we so close to release Mar 13 21:37:38 there is a need to identify core packages Mar 13 21:37:46 and close on them very early Mar 13 21:38:02 and openssl is certainly one of them Mar 13 21:38:42 while we could hold gdb upgrade openssl should be held even before that Mar 13 21:39:52 pkgconfigs have changed Mar 13 21:56:12 * Crofton|work wonders how much pain it will be to update gpsd Mar 13 21:59:36 will package_qa allow something to be installed in /opt? Mar 13 22:06:54 cyclist: yocto supports either dash or bash as /bin/sh, so best to avoid bashisms like arrays in tasks, fyi Mar 13 22:07:05 probably? worst case you can disable the test that blocks it, if not Mar 13 22:11:46 thanks. I'm setting up a system for someone who wants their own stuff isolated Mar 13 22:12:09 Seems reasonable Mar 13 22:22:34 I have the line: "$(CXX) -DVIRTUALIZED $(INCLUDES) -g -o $@ -c $<" in a Makefile. The -DVIRTUALIZED and ${INCLUDES) are getting stripped out while a regular c compiler line just like that works. Is that something bitbake is doing? Mar 13 22:22:54 highly unlikely, all we do is pass things in, we don't modify the makefile Mar 13 22:25:46 ok, just checking. I added those to CXXFLAGS and it worked. I'd still like not to have to pass all the includes that way Mar 13 22:26:18 there's only one in this case, though Mar 13 22:28:51 that's odd. Mar 13 22:29:42 I've been beating my head against the wall with just about everything I've added to this project Mar 13 22:31:57 I'll have to find a makefile that works like this using includes and just emulate it. I'm pretty sure that it's working outside yocto, though, because they've been building it that way Mar 13 23:08:04 cyclist: i'd suggest constructing a minimal test case. create a new empty amakefile with just taht rule and see how it behaves. Mar 14 01:00:54 * nerdboy looking at the different sizes of time slots on http://elcabs2015.sched.org/ **** ENDING LOGGING AT Sat Mar 14 02:59:59 2015