**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Wed Jun 10 02:59:59 2015 Jun 10 05:32:31 morning all Jun 10 05:34:20 why if i build for 'atom tuned' an image i only able to run in the target but not with qemu (movbe required)?? but if i build for core2 it works fine in both target and qemu ?? clues?? Jun 10 06:07:05 sm0ketst: well what clue do you expect? have you checked if qemu explicitly supports the atom tune command set? Jun 10 06:08:31 LetoThe2nd: i was expecting yes... Jun 10 06:11:11 sm0ketst: "expect" != "verify" Jun 10 06:11:36 LetoThe2nd: absolutly right :) Jun 10 06:33:10 LetoThe2nd: AFAIK by http://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/65421/ is better in this case to use tune-core2 instead of tune-atom Jun 10 06:34:46 sm0ketst: ... which corresponds to your own findings :) Jun 10 06:35:26 :) Jun 10 06:38:56 LetoThe2nd: I've also tried qemuparams="-cpu n270,+movbe" but the same, so still checking Jun 10 06:41:58 <_4urele_> hi everyone! Jun 10 06:52:49 silviof: ping - do you maybe know of a nice setup with lvds, preferably atmel sama5? Jun 10 06:55:28 LetoThe2nd: no - nothing in my mind, sorry Jun 10 06:55:43 silviof: ok, thanks :/ Jun 10 07:00:13 silviof: something recommendable with another soc, maybe? Jun 10 07:28:34 LetoThe2nd: Since qemu 1.3 the movbe/atom is supported according the changelog. For 'dizzy' qemu v2.1 is generated for native, so should it support n270/atom ?? Jun 10 07:29:42 sm0ketst: possibly, the next step would be checking which flags/configuration options are passed to qemu then. Jun 10 07:33:21 "-cpu kvm32" and "enable-kvm" are passed, so if i add to runqemu the qemuparams with the n270 i'm passing twice the cpu flag, dont know if the issue is there Jun 10 07:39:20 LetoThe2nd: default runqemu (not with the kvm flag) uses in my layout 'qemu32' as cpu but issuing the complete command (not by runqemu) and using -cpu n270,+movbe runs fine, so i need now to know how to pass the cpu stuff to the runqemu Jun 10 07:40:26 sm0ketst: well look at the runqemu sript, or just stick to manually calling it Jun 10 07:40:53 LetoThe2nd: thanks indeed Jun 10 09:00:16 I think i got something wrong with the AUTOREV usage. I want to build latest HEAD package. But my package version is for example in this style: 1.0.1_+gitr0+35a5a2ceb4-r3. So, why is there gitr0 ? http://nopaste.inside-irc.net/paste/nPMw30sjY/ Jun 10 09:01:35 my problem now is that after another commit the package version value is smaller instead of greater, because the hash has lower valued charaters: 1.0.1_+gitr0+11e64e5497-r4. I guess the problem is with gitr0, it should not be r0 right? Jun 10 09:03:33 irontia: if you want that number to increment you should enable the PR service Jun 10 09:03:55 irontia: http://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/current/dev-manual/dev-manual.html#working-with-a-pr-service Jun 10 09:04:17 thanks Jun 10 09:09:39 morning all Jun 10 09:14:26 Hi there : Jun 10 09:14:30 ! Jun 10 09:14:43 I have a ntp issue, my system is not adjusting its time Jun 10 09:15:03 I think it is a config issue, but can't find out what$ Jun 10 09:19:27 jmleo: are you trying to use ntp, ntpdate or systemd's time daemon (or something else)? Jun 10 09:21:11 bluelightning: ntp Jun 10 09:21:16 I don't have systemd Jun 10 09:21:19 ok Jun 10 09:21:33 did you configure it to point to a server? Jun 10 09:21:41 (it doesn't come preconfigured) Jun 10 09:22:00 bluelightning: in /etc/ntp.conf, I added a server 0.fr.pool.ntp.org line Jun 10 09:22:20 before the driftfile line and that's all Jun 10 09:22:48 ok, and is there anything from ntpd in the logs? Jun 10 09:22:52 I just read the commet Jun 10 09:22:55 comment Jun 10 09:23:09 and it says to remove the server 127.127.1.0 line Jun 10 09:23:18 so, I think this is my issue Jun 10 09:35:48 bluelightning: it is a configuration issue. I will add a bbappend and it should be fine. Thanks :) Jun 10 09:36:24 ok Jun 10 09:37:38 jmleo: just a reminder in case you haven't seen it - http://www.pool.ntp.org/en/vendors.html Jun 10 09:37:53 (in case you're building a commercial product...) Jun 10 09:40:16 bluelightning: I didn't know Jun 10 09:40:21 thanks you Jun 10 09:40:27 thank* Jun 10 15:06:53 <_4urele_> hi I have 2 different machines I would like to have different MD5 for a downloaded file Jun 10 15:07:30 <_4urele_> should I wrote SRC_URI[md5sum]_machine or SRC_URI_machine[md5sum] Jun 10 15:14:29 _4urele_: why does the same url result in different checksums? Jun 10 15:14:59 <_4urele_> rburton, because it is not the same url ;) Jun 10 15:15:29 ah you've a src_uri set by machine too Jun 10 15:15:39 override then flag Jun 10 15:15:43 <_4urele_> it is to download an initramfs Jun 10 15:15:45 for the latter Jun 10 15:16:00 <_4urele_> rburton, could you explain a bit more? Jun 10 15:16:18 SRC_URI_machine[md5sum] Jun 10 15:17:17 <_4urele_> rburton, thanks, I did not knew where to put it ;), I tried both, but your solution doesn't work... Jun 10 15:18:46 <_4urele_> rburton, it works for SRC_URI but not for SRC_URI_machine[md5sum] Jun 10 15:18:54 hm, surprised Jun 10 15:19:06 something isn't checking overrides, you might want to file a bug for that Jun 10 15:19:16 <_4urele_> bitbake says it didn't found the md5 or sha Jun 10 15:19:44 the alternative would be to give each machine uri a name and then refer to the names in the checksum statements Jun 10 15:19:57 <_4urele_> maybe I know why ;) Jun 10 15:19:58 * rburton finds example Jun 10 15:20:26 SRC_URI_mymachine = "http://foo.com/foo;name=mymachine-foo" Jun 10 15:20:40 SRC_URI[mymachine.md5sum] = "123" Jun 10 15:20:43 damnit Jun 10 15:20:46 <_4urele_> I have a variable to modify SRC_URI but not a SRC_URI_machine Jun 10 15:20:51 SRC_URI[mymachine-foo.md5sum] = "123" Jun 10 15:20:56 same difference Jun 10 15:21:23 add ;name= to the uri and you can identify them in checksums Jun 10 15:23:18 <_4urele_> rburton, well played! Jun 10 15:24:26 <_4urele_> rburton, thanks a lot Jun 10 16:27:24 Does anyone know if there is an easy way to list installed packages and licenses ? Jun 10 16:32:54 i have a layer that applies a bbapend which references a patch. However, it seems bitbake is looking in the original recipe for the patch instead of my layer. Jun 10 16:33:26 what is the proper way to bbappend with a patch? Jun 10 16:36:12 tripzero: does your bbappend do FILESEXTRAPATHS_prepend ? Jun 10 16:36:25 no Jun 10 16:36:39 will add Jun 10 16:36:48 thx Jun 10 16:36:57 FILESEXTRAPATHS_prepend := "${THISDIR}/${PN}:" Jun 10 16:38:01 is ${THISDIR} an actual literal macro? Jun 10 16:38:44 THISDIR is a variable, it gets set automatically Jun 10 16:40:40 awesome. it werks Jun 10 19:18:16 I need to add a /etc/ptp4l.conf file to my image. Is the best way a bbappend recipe of the base-core? or the linuxptp recipe? I'm kind of new to this... Jun 10 21:26:11 hi. need a hint. i'm creating a custom machine based on raspberrypi from meta-raspberrypi. i fail to build an image because the required bcm2835-bootfiles.bb has COMPATIBLE_MACHINE set to only "raspberrypi" Jun 10 21:27:22 is there any way to either add this custom machine to the compatible machines, or to make bcm2835-bootfiles.bb understand that this machine is derived from raspberrypi and therefore compatible? Jun 10 21:29:22 oh. i'm stupid. i should create a bbappend and add this machine to COMPATIBLE_MACHINE there .... **** ENDING LOGGING AT Thu Jun 11 02:59:59 2015