**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Fri Sep 23 02:59:58 2016 Sep 23 09:15:50 I'm getting a ERROR: QA Issue: A rdepends on libB-dev [dev-deps] although in A's recipe I've got "RDEPENDS_${PN} = "libB" and not "libB-dev". Why does bb assume that i want the dev version of that lib? Sep 23 09:56:43 Anticom: the -dev package is required to build your recipe. Using DEPENDS = "libB" should be sufficient (assuming "libB" is your recipe's name), that part of the RDEPENDS will be automatically computed Sep 23 09:57:26 yann: but why should the -dev package be required to build my recipe? Sep 23 09:58:31 yes, but it should be transparent to you - it's usually built by the libB recipe Sep 23 09:58:44 yann: basically i want the lib in the regular packages and only the headers in the dev package. I thought that's the usual way packages are organized Sep 23 09:58:53 yes Sep 23 09:59:17 libB is your own recipe, or a pre-existing one ? Sep 23 09:59:58 yann: it's my own recipe, it's cmake based Sep 23 10:01:00 also i don't get why it's placing source files to the packages-split directory Sep 23 10:01:17 OK, so you have to make it create the -dev package - looking for an existing recipe as a model is a good idea Sep 23 10:02:02 source files are included in the -dbg package usually, so you can run source-level gdb on the target Sep 23 10:03:34 you can eg. use meta/recipes-core/libxml/ as a model - not sure it's the simplest one but it should fit Sep 23 10:06:52 damned, "bitbake core-image-minimal-initramfs -c clean" won't remove tmp/deploy/images/*/core-image-minimal-initramfs-*.cpio.gz ? wtf :) Sep 23 10:07:19 yann: why should it? Sep 23 10:07:33 yann: thats the output directory, not the working/staging stuff. Sep 23 10:09:56 in fact, my version on disk includes files from an obsolete package, and it does not get properly refreshed, so I'm looking for the problem - but it is apparently not here, since bitbake does rebuild the cpio archive - it's just that an old initramfs-live-install-efi is getting used Sep 23 10:11:31 yann: a common cause for such hassles is stuff like EXTERNAL_SRC and comparables. Sep 23 10:11:55 ah, I removed a machine-specific recipe, but the old ipk with higher PR was still in deploy/ipk Sep 23 10:12:26 but that's apparently not the whole problem Sep 23 10:15:37 still had to clean the initramfs-* and core-image-minimal-initramfs recipes before it includes the correct version Sep 23 10:22:50 and afterwards my (core)-image-x11 image does not get regenerated automatically, even though even though core-image-minimal-initramfs is more recent Sep 23 12:41:34 funny, building an image with IMAGE_FEATURES += "tools-sdk tools-debug dev-pkgs dbg-pkgs" I get a failure related to x11-common: bitbake apparently considers xserver-common as a provider of x11-common, and subsequently an expected version mismatch prevents do_rootfs to complete Sep 23 12:42:11 but xserver-common does not provide x11-common, it just replaces/conflicts it Sep 23 12:45:33 packagegroup-core-x11-utils is the only one depending on x11-common, and many others depend on conflicting xserver-common Sep 23 12:47:44 packagegroup-core-x11-utils is in turned pulled by packagegroup-core-x11-base-dev, through dev-pkgs I guess Sep 23 14:04:20 JaMa: Have you any update on https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10102 - how frequently are you seeing that? Sep 23 14:04:22 Bug 10102: normal, Medium+, 2.2 M4, ross.burton, NEW , gdk-pixbuf-native missing dependency on pcre needed by glib-2.0-native Sep 23 14:47:13 hello yocto maniacs :) Sep 23 14:47:30 I am trying to build an image via systemd-nspawn container Sep 23 14:48:12 but I get an error everytime: MACHINE=varsomam33 bitbake tisdk-rootfs-image Sep 23 14:48:15 ERROR: Timeout while attempting to communicate with bitbake server Sep 23 14:48:27 on the host machine everything works ok Sep 23 14:52:19 is is possible to build an image by yocto in systemd container? Sep 23 15:05:56 Ox4: yes, i and others have done builds in containers with systemd-nspawn and other similar tools Sep 23 15:20:38 kergoth: how did you run it? Sep 23 15:20:51 kergoth: and why do I have such problem? Sep 23 15:21:19 kergoth: BTW, I am using debian jessie with systemd version 215 Sep 23 15:34:56 kergoth: could you please help? Sep 23 15:35:13 some of us have actual *work* to do Sep 23 15:35:17 ask your questions and wait. Sep 23 15:36:45 ok, sorry Sep 23 15:57:51 Ox4: i didn't do anything special, it just worked. no idea why you're hitting that problem. try googling for the error? Sep 23 15:58:43 I did it, but there are no results. Anyway it seems I have resolved this issue Sep 23 23:07:21 hello Sep 23 23:08:04 how would i go about getting a basic x11 + wm setup on yocto from a minimal install ? **** ENDING LOGGING AT Sat Sep 24 02:59:58 2016