**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Wed Jul 04 03:00:04 2018 Jul 04 03:34:38 christner_home: cmake files might be detecting libnl, so try inherit pkgconfig and see if that helps Jul 04 09:14:55 New news from stackoverflow: Yocto sumo with RPI3B+ with older Boost Jul 04 09:46:49 anyone else had problems with "smart newer/upgrade"? for some reason smart doesn't recognize an updated version of a package *except* for -lic component. Jul 04 09:47:19 wondering if I should debug this further or just upgrade to sumo Jul 04 10:15:06 New news from stackoverflow: how to remove qt keyboard support for qtwebbroser from qt5.7 Jul 04 11:14:37 lindblandro: upgrading to sumo seems like a good idea anyway Jul 04 11:41:53 Hey, relatively silly question here. I'm trying to "devtool modify" a recipe that a module vendor has written. The problem is that the original repo they're cloning from has code with CRLF endings. So the recipe fixes this before applying patches. Jul 04 11:42:38 If I try to run devtool modify against this recipe it fails because devtool obviously doesn't have that function Jul 04 11:42:55 Is there a smart way to get around this? Jul 04 12:00:34 ERROR: linux-libc-headers-4.12-r0 do_package_write_rpm: The recipe linux-libc-headers is trying to install files into a shared area when those files already exist. Those files and their manifest location are: /media/harddisk1/dsg-a/deploy/rpm/cortexa9hf_neon/linux-libc-headers-dbg-4.12-r0.cortexa9hf_neon.rpm (not matched to any task) /media/harddisk1/dsg-a/deploy/rpm/cortexa9hf_neon/linux-libc-headers-dev-4.12-r0.cortexa9hf_n Jul 04 12:01:28 I'm getting the above errors, can any body help? Jul 04 12:05:20 my first thought is that at least two packages try to install same file Jul 04 12:05:39 but i may be wrong Jul 04 12:06:18 How could I debug this? Jul 04 12:08:40 error message is incomplete, right? Jul 04 12:09:22 anyway, it seems to me that both rpms have same file(s) Jul 04 12:09:33 -dbg , -dev Jul 04 12:13:46 It seems like the error message got truncated somehow Jul 04 12:13:58 Next try: ERROR: linux-libc-headers-4.12-r0 do_package_write_rpm: The recipe linux-libc-headers is trying to install files into a shared area when those files already exist. Those files and their manifest location are: /media/harddisk1/dsg-a/deploy/rpm/cortexa9hf_neon/linux-libc-headers-dbg-4.12-r0.cortexa9hf_neon.rpm (not matched to any task) /media/harddisk1/dsg-a/deploy/rpm/cortexa9hf_neon/linux-libc-headers-dev-4.12-r0.co Jul 04 12:14:32 Hmm Jul 04 12:14:50 ERROR: linux-libc-headers-4.12-r0 do_package_write_rpm: The recipe linux-libc-headers is trying to install files into a shared area when those files already exist. Those files and their manifest location are: Jul 04 12:14:58 /media/harddisk1/dsg-a/deploy/rpm/cortexa9hf_neon/linux-libc-headers-dbg-4.12-r0.cortexa9hf_neon.rpm Jul 04 12:15:06 (not matched to any task) Jul 04 12:15:15 /media/harddisk1/dsg-a/deploy/rpm/cortexa9hf_neon/linux-libc-headers-dev-4.12-r0.cortexa9hf_neon.rpm Jul 04 12:15:23 (not matched to any task) Please verify which recipe should provide the above files. Jul 04 12:30:22 Sorry my mistake, I tried to do a full rebuild so I remove the /tmp and /sstate-cache from the build directory, but I did not remove the deploy directory. ;-( Jul 04 12:45:39 generally no need to remove sstate-cache unless you *really* want to build from scratch Jul 04 12:45:58 and deploy is in tmp so not sure what happened... Jul 04 13:27:55 Hi, i'am confused about some aspects of yocto build. I generates two sdk of two differents machine from yocto but the sysroot of these sdk are different. I expeted to have the same sysroot because of the image generated contains the same software package. Do you have an explanation? Thanks Jul 04 13:31:26 "are different" - how exactly? There could be per _machine customizations in recipes Jul 04 13:32:56 luneff: there is many program and lib which is not present on one of the sysroot Jul 04 13:33:26 how did you build the SDKs Jul 04 13:34:39 rburton: I build a core-image-sato for the two machine and run bitbake core-image-sato -c populate sdk Jul 04 13:38:38 assuming the only difference is MACHINE then there shoudl be no differences, so please pastebin what the differences are Jul 04 13:38:45 maybe a pair of file lists Jul 04 13:39:07 (apart from differences like machine-specific binaries) Jul 04 14:00:37 my ${SRCPV} is replaced with AUTOINC+1b482764fc but the manual specifies AUTOINC should be replaced with a number, or zero Jul 04 14:00:40 but it's not happening Jul 04 14:00:52 I still get the string "AUTOINC" just as is Jul 04 14:03:46 rburton: I think i find out what the difference comes. I have a package that is not in one of my build thus the difference. thank you for the help. Jul 04 14:16:46 Hi, I'm having kind of confusion about kernel module autoloading. There's KERNEL_MODULE_AUTOLOAD variable, but there's also kernel-modules package which can be assigned to MACHINE_EXTRA_RRECOMMENDS. Jul 04 14:17:22 What's the difference between them and which setting has a precedence? Jul 04 14:23:21 one installs the modules, one autoloads. Jul 04 14:23:45 also, kernel-modules is a meta package that depends on all the individual module packages. Jul 04 14:23:54 rdepends, I should say. Jul 04 14:28:36 I'd like to install and load all modules inside kernel source which are declared as =m in my defconfig and KERNEL_FEATURES, any idea how to do this without manually typing all module names into KERNEL_MODULE_AUTOLOAD? Jul 04 16:16:13 New news from stackoverflow: How is /dev/block/bootdevic/by-name created? Jul 04 16:23:39 RP: we need to revert http://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/commit/?id=2e7f3b2b9318d1e5395ad58131eafb873f614326 Jul 04 16:23:49 RP: that change is wrong Jul 04 16:25:08 if we want to transform plain .dts files into .dtb targets then we should check for file extention and then do it. Jul 04 16:26:12 since kernel make infra allows to do make path/to/dtb or path/to/dtbo Jul 04 19:33:15 hello is there any available documentation how to enable plymouth splash for x86 intel nut? Jul 04 19:33:28 I'm trying to do it for few days but still without success Jul 04 20:16:53 New news from stackoverflow: Using printers on Yocto Jul 04 22:45:17 khem: can you send a revert patch with the details in the commit message please? Jul 04 22:45:45 khem: looks like martin already did **** ENDING LOGGING AT Thu Jul 05 03:00:01 2018