**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Fri May 10 03:01:14 2019
May 10 05:11:41 <black_13> what TOPDIR defined as
May 10 06:27:12 <mckoan> good morning
May 10 07:05:32 * alessioigor waves all
May 10 07:05:43 <alessioigor> Is there a way to generate a x86_64 image, few ARM images and, at the end, an image with the former x86_64 image and the SDKs installed of the latters'?
May 10 07:12:49 <mckoan> alessioigor: all in a single shot ?
May 10 07:14:37 <alessioigor> mckoan: No I'm not so ambitious :-)
May 10 07:30:09 <erbo> alessioigor: I think you should be able to achieve that using https://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/2.8/dev-manual/dev-manual.html#dev-building-images-for-multiple-targets-using-multiple-configurations
May 10 07:31:11 <erbo> At least that provides you with some mechanism to build stuff for multiple machines, and make a recipe for one machine depend on certain tasks from a recipe for another machine.
May 10 07:33:43 <alessioigor> erbo: I'll give it a try. Thank you!
May 10 08:32:37 <diembed> Hello everyone
May 10 08:37:09 <diembed> There is a problem when I try to generate core-image-x11. When rootfs is generated, the following error occurs. Do you have any leads for me to debug this ? (https://pastebin.com/5ftX7MVQ)
May 10 08:37:58 <diembed> The MACHINE is imx6qdlsabresd.conf and the problematic package is xf86-video-imx-vivante.
May 10 08:39:43 <diembed> All files are untouched. I only modify imx6qdlsabresd to get u-boot from meta-dhcom instead of the meta-freescale (which is not deploying)
May 10 09:45:53 <kanavin_> RP, any hint about why webkit update was dropped?
May 10 10:23:34 <yocti> New news from stackoverflow: Files related to Audit daemon are not in rootfs <https://stackoverflow.com/questions/56075357/files-related-to-audit-daemon-are-not-in-rootfs>
May 10 12:15:00 <ernstp> which ML should I submit a patch for bitbake/lib/bb/fetch2/__init__.py to? oe-core? bitbake-devel?
May 10 12:16:54 <kroon> ernstp, bitbake-devel
May 10 12:21:39 <ernstp> kroon: thanks
May 10 13:39:44 <black_13> .
May 10 13:54:13 <yocti> New news from stackoverflow: How to send a compiled file to sama5d27 board and execute it <https://stackoverflow.com/questions/56078685/how-to-send-a-compiled-file-to-sama5d27-board-and-execute-it>
May 10 14:06:52 <black_13> is there macro that describes the current location of where the yocto build dir is
May 10 14:26:01 <nayfe> ${B}
May 10 14:32:46 <black_13> can yocto access the value of the home directory $HOME i.e. /home/user ?
May 10 14:33:29 <black_13> I would like to set the TMPDIR to /home/user/something
May 10 14:34:28 <milloni> the point is that the build system shouldn't just randomly take stuff off your filesystem
May 10 14:34:36 <milloni> everything should be specified in the recipes
May 10 14:35:08 <milloni> yocto is not that great at it but it's an ideal to strive for
May 10 14:38:52 <black_13> milloni: could you explain your point a bit more
May 10 14:39:49 <black_13> i was not interested in taking "off" but when bitbake is complete the results end up at a location relative to my home directory
May 10 14:43:03 <milloni> oh, then i misunderstood your point, my apologies
May 10 14:46:00 <black_13> no I didn't explain
May 10 14:51:22 <milloni> i'm trying to remove wpa-supplicant from my build, IMAGE_INSTALL_remove doesn't work, i think it's because connman is built with support for wifi
May 10 14:51:36 <milloni> how can i build connman with no wifi support
May 10 14:52:33 <milloni> i looked at https://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit.cgi/poky/plain/meta/recipes-connectivity/connman/connman.inc
May 10 14:53:22 <milloni> i added PACKAGECONFIG_remove_pn-connman = "wifi" to my image configuration but that didn't do it
May 10 15:25:49 <rburton> milloni: image config won't help, local.conf or a bbappend
May 10 15:26:14 <rburton> put it in the image configuration and the assignment is only visible to the image recipe, connman won't see the change
May 10 15:26:35 <milloni> so, sorry, which bbappend?
May 10 15:26:51 <rburton> a bbappend you write for connman
May 10 15:26:57 <rburton> or your local.conf or ideally your distro config
May 10 15:27:20 <milloni> my local.conf seems to be autogenerated...
May 10 15:27:33 <milloni> it's not checked into the git repo i'm looking at
May 10 15:27:38 <milloni> it's a bit of a strange build
May 10 15:29:35 <milloni> rburton: would it be something like recipes-connectivity/connman/connman_%.bbappend ?
May 10 15:29:39 <rburton> yes
May 10 15:29:50 <milloni> thanks, i'll try that
May 10 15:34:30 <milloni> rburton: will PACKAGECONFIG_remove_${PN} do (in the bbappend) instead of PACKAGECONFIG_remove_pn-connman?
May 10 15:35:24 <rburton> in a bbappend just PACKAGECONFIG_remove
May 10 15:38:53 <milloni> ok
May 10 15:54:36 <yocti> New news from stackoverflow: Cross-Compiling to ARM target hardware: getting errors : aarch64-linux-gnu-g++: error: unrecognized command line option ‘-msse4.2’ <https://stackoverflow.com/questions/56080689/cross-compiling-to-arm-target-hardware-getting-errors-aarch64-linux-gnu-g> || Yocto Toaster only shows first rootfs built <https://stackoverflow.com/questions/56080648/yocto-toaster-only-shows-first-rootfs-built>
May 10 16:27:43 <kergoth> huh, https://tirkarthi.github.io/programming/2019/05/08/f-string-debugging.html
May 10 17:41:45 <RP> kanavin_: lots of autobuilder failures I haven't had a chance to summarise
May 10 17:46:02 <armpit> will "broke" work ?
May 10 18:25:02 <yocti> New news from stackoverflow: How to send a compiled file to sama5d27 board and execute it? <https://stackoverflow.com/questions/56078685/how-to-send-a-compiled-file-to-sama5d27-board-and-execute-it>
May 10 19:21:46 <halstead> RP, armpit Maintenance complete.
May 10 19:22:34 <halstead> RP, Curious about starting a benchmark build. Should we use a-full or a-quick? And is the warrior branch the best for this?
May 10 19:25:11 <yocti> New news from stackoverflow: Upgrading (overriding) an entire recipe in a custom layer <https://stackoverflow.com/questions/56083565/upgrading-overriding-an-entire-recipe-in-a-custom-layer>
May 10 20:29:06 <armpit> halstead, yes, warrior should be good
May 10 20:29:08 <armpit> thanks
May 10 20:29:44 <halstead> armpit, Do you know if quick or full is a better benchmark for comparing cluster performance?
May 10 20:31:26 <armpit> full hits all hosts for oe-selftest
May 10 20:31:53 <armpit> so I guess a-full
May 10 20:33:13 <armpit> unless you are thinking of buildperf?
May 10 20:35:54 <halstead> I'm thinking of overall build time.
May 10 20:36:15 <halstead> I'll invalidate sstate and run a-full on warrior.
May 10 21:06:00 <armpit> k
**** ENDING LOGGING AT Sat May 11 02:59:57 2019